<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Optimisation Services, Expert SEO Solutions- Bluelight SEO &#187; News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/category/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk</link>
	<description>SEO Services UK!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Riding The Wave!</title>
		<link>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/google-riding-the-wave/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/google-riding-the-wave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BluelightSEO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google wave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week Google released Google Wave to around 100,000 trial users, described by Google as an online tool for real-time communication and collaboration.<br />
Google appears to be trying to grab a hold of the Social Media world, by creating a tool that could rival MSN Live Messenger and perhaps even Facebook. This is what they hope to achieve anyway, but is it really that unique?<br...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fgoogle-riding-the-wave%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fgoogle-riding-the-wave%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>This week Google released Google Wave to around 100,000 trial users, described by Google as an online tool for real-time communication and collaboration.</p>
<p>Google appears to be trying to grab a hold of the Social Media world, by creating a tool that could rival MSN Live Messenger and perhaps even Facebook. This is what they hope to achieve anyway, but is it really that unique?</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/09/who_will_ride_googles_wave.html">BBC</a> have had a play with it and described it as &#8220;little more than a combination of e-mail and instant messaging on steroids&#8221;</p>
<div id="rory_300909" class="player" style="margin-left: 40px;">
<embed id="bbc_emp_embed_rory_300909" width="512" height="323" flashvars="embedReferer=http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/&#038;embedPageUrl=http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/09/who_will_ride_googles_wave.html&#038;domId=rory_300909&#038;playlist=http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/emp/8280000/8282600/8282687.xml" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="default" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" name="bbc_emp_embed_rory_300909" style="" src="http://www.bbc.co.uk/emp/9player.swf?revision=13439_13730" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"/>
</div>
<p></br></p>
<p>Although I am yet to have a go myself, I would have to agree with the above statement! Do we really need Wave? I for one am comfortable keeping my social contacts on Facebook and Messenger and my business via email. From what I have heard so far Google Wave doesn&#8217;t seem to be anything exciting other than the fact you can watch people typing, and have a quick game of sudoku.</p>
<p>Google do insist that they have lots of plugins and the potential for more which is good news, perhaps this is a building block for Google OS, something which I am a lot more enthusiastic about.</p>
<p>I would love to hear opinions on this, and if anyone has a spare Google Wave invite lying around so that I can do some &#8220;research&#8221; please get in touch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/google-riding-the-wave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo &#8220;It&#8217;s You&#8221; Campaign Begins!</title>
		<link>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/yahoo-its-you-campaign-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/yahoo-its-you-campaign-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BluelightSEO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Yahoo campaign reported last week at Search Engine Land began today in the US!<br />
This is the single-largest global integrated Yahoo marketing campaign ever and it is set to hit the rest of the world, on TV, Radio and Online from the 5th of October and throughout 2010.<br />
For those who haven&#8217;t seen it yet, here is the TV advertisement-<br />
This video was...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fyahoo-its-you-campaign-begins%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fyahoo-its-you-campaign-begins%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>The new Yahoo campaign reported last week at <a href="http://searchengineland.com/liveblogging-the-yahoo-its-you-press-conference-26305">Search Engine Land</a> began today in the US!</p>
<p>This is the <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Yahoo-Puts-Its-Focus-on-bw-2363354857.html" class="broken_link" >single-largest global integrated Yahoo marketing campaign ever</a> and it is set to hit the rest of the world, on TV, Radio and Online from the 5th of October and throughout 2010.</p>
<p>For those who haven&#8217;t seen it yet, here is the TV advertisement-</p>
<p><object width="560" height="340" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/MqbaZcX67L0&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MqbaZcX67L0&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18" />This video was embedded using the YouTuber plugin by <a href="http://www.roytanck.com">Roy Tanck</a>. Adobe Flash Player is required to view the video.</object></p>
<p>The &#8220;It&#8217;s You&#8221; branding is designed to emphasise the whole &#8220;user experience&#8221; motive that Yahoo is now focused on, something which can be seen from the <a href="http://www.yahoo.co.uk">new search layout.</a></p>
<p>Personally it think it&#8217;s nice to hear the &#8220;Yahooooo hooo&#8221; again, there is something nostalgic about it and perhaps others will be reminded of Yahoo&#8217;s presence with this campaign too, if anything it will be interesting to see how much traffic Yahoo receive from this!</p>
<p>You can see more on this campaign at <a href="http://www.youandyahoo.com" class="broken_link" >www.youandyahoo.com</a></p>
<p><a title="Infoserve" href="http://www.city-visitor.com/about_infoserve.html">Infoserve</a> are the exclusive provider of Yahoo Local listings, <a href="search.infoserve.com">get Listed now!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/yahoo-its-you-campaign-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BT Yahoo Portal Chooses Google To Power Search</title>
		<link>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/bt-yahoo-portal-chooses-google-to-power-search/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/bt-yahoo-portal-chooses-google-to-power-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BluelightSEO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BT Yahoo portal has recently changed natural search provider to Google. It appears that a deal between the 3 companies has permitted BT to use Google results.<br />
Although BT has a deal with Yahoo to provide portal services until 2011, it appears that a deal has been done to allow Google to gain a bigger market share in the UK market. <br />
A BT...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fbt-yahoo-portal-chooses-google-to-power-search%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fbt-yahoo-portal-chooses-google-to-power-search%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>The BT Yahoo portal has recently changed natural search provider to Google. It appears that a deal between the 3 companies has permitted BT to use Google results.</p>
<p>Although BT has a deal with Yahoo to provide portal services until 2011, it appears that a deal has been done to allow Google to gain a bigger market share in the UK market. </p>
<p>A BT spokesman said: “We are delighted that we are continuing to work with Yahoo! through to 2011. As part of this new agreement BT Yahoo!’s web search will be provided by Google. We made this decision based on the fact that Google is the most popular search engine in the UK.</p>
<p>“The combination of Google’s search engine with Yahoo’s leading content and email services offers customers the ultimate broadband experience.”</p>
<p>It would be interesting to hear Yahoo and Googles comments on this deal.</p>
<p>35% of all UK Broadband users use BT Broadband, and I am sure a lot of those will have the BT Yahoo portal as their homepage, it will be interesting to see what affect this will have on both Google and Yahoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/bt-yahoo-portal-chooses-google-to-power-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>W3C Validation, Is it worth it?</title>
		<link>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/w3c-validator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/w3c-validator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BluelightSEO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w3c]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southernmedia.no-ip.org/bluelightseo/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is often debate about the use  of the w3c validator for SEO. Is it really worth your time and effort  to get that green “Passed” sign on the w3c validator?<br />
<br />
<br />
On the whole…Yes<br />
In terms of SEO…No, not really.<br />
Rand Fishkin talks about w3c validation  in his interview with Mike McDonald at WebProNews.com, he states-<br />
“In terms of SEO...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fw3c-validator%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fw3c-validator%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-33" title="img_post-01" src="http://bluelightseo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/img_post-011.jpg" alt="img_post-01" width="238" height="178" />There is often debate about the use  of the w3c validator for SEO. Is it really worth your time and effort  to get that green “Passed” sign on the w3c validator?</p>
<div style="margin: 1ex;">
<div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">On the whole…Yes</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">In terms of SEO…No, not really.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Rand Fishkin talks about w3c validation  in his interview with Mike McDonald at WebProNews.com, he states-</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">“In terms of SEO and search engine  ranking, the simple reality is: IT DOESN’T MATTER.  It never has mattered  and I daresay it never will matter.  Can it hurt you to have valid code?   Certainly not.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">I would imagine that most of you would  agree with this statement, and with good reason. I have worked with  many sites that have hundreds of errors, and they still rank just as  well as they do with valid code.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Even Google, Bing and Twitter have  errors, that must tell you something? If Google are ignoring it, then  so should you? Right?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Perhaps not! Although Google isn’t  really bothered whether the validator shows up green or red for you,  there are often accessibility issues that can mean visitors cannot see  vital areas of your site. Although it may appear fine in your browser,  it may not appear correctly in another. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Fixing errors won’t necessarily affect  your SERP’s but it could ultimately affect your conversions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">There are 2 things I would suggest  fixing at the very least, and they are XML Parsing Errors and Missing  Alt Descriptions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">The more people that can view your  site correctly, the more conversions you will make</span></div>
</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 678px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">
<div style="margin: 1ex;">
<div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">W3C Validation, Is it worth it?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">There is often debate about the use  of the w3c validator for SEO. Is it really worth your time and effort  to get that green “Passed” sign on the w3c validator?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">On the whole…Yes</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">In terms of SEO…No, not really.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Rand Fishkin talks about w3c validation  in his interview with Mike McDonald at WebProNews.com, he states-</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">“In terms of SEO and search engine  ranking, the simple reality is: IT DOESN’T MATTER.  It never has mattered  and I daresay it never will matter.  Can it hurt you to have valid code?   Certainly not.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">I would imagine that most of you would  agree with this statement, and with good reason. I have worked with  many sites that have hundreds of errors, and they still rank just as  well as they do with valid code.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Even Google, Bing and Twitter have  errors, that must tell you something? If Google are ignoring it, then  so should you? Right?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Perhaps not! Although Google isn’t  really bothered whether the validator shows up green or red for you,  there are often accessibility issues that can mean visitors cannot see  vital areas of your site. Although it may appear fine in your browser,  it may not appear correctly in another. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Fixing errors won’t necessarily affect  your SERP’s but it could ultimately affect your conversions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">There are 2 things I would suggest  fixing at the very least, and they are XML Parsing Errors and Missing  Alt Descriptions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">The more people that can view your  site correctly, the more conversions you will make</span></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/w3c-validator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Badda Bing!</title>
		<link>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/badda-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/badda-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BluelightSEO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southernmedia.no-ip.org/bluelightseo/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Microsoft is trying to compete with Google, and in a big way!<br />
Microsoft released Bing at the end of May and it looks like they are aiming to compete with Google, good luck with that!<br />
Microsoft describe Bing as “a new Decision Engine and consumer brand, providing customers with a first step in moving beyond search to help make faster, more informed decisions”<br />
At...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fbadda-bing%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fbadda-bing%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>So Microsoft is trying to compete with Google, and in a big way!</p>
<p>Microsoft released Bing at the end of May and it looks like they are aiming to compete with Google, good luck with that!</p>
<p>Microsoft describe Bing as “a new Decision Engine and consumer brand, providing customers with a first step in moving beyond search to help make faster, more informed decisions”</p>
<p>At first look Bing appears to be very simplistic (not as simplistic as Google, but can you get any simpler than Google?). When you first view the homepage you might think you have stumbled upon a photographers holiday snaps site.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-66" title="bing-index" src="http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/bing_index.jpg" alt="bing-index" width="571" height="320" /></p>
<p>Simple and also very appealing pictures.</p>
<p>When I search for the term SEO here are the results I get</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-68" title="bing-results" src="http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/bing_results.jpg" alt="bing-results" width="582" height="357" /></p>
<p>Similar results to Google (but not exactly the same) and with some related searches that appear to be taken from a list of most searched terms to the left.</p>
<p>The layout itself is pretty much just Google (why try and fix something that isn’t broken, right?)</p>
<p>Moving on to the Local results it appears they have adopted the same approach as Google, it appears that on Bing United Stated they are using yellowpages.com for the sponsored results and then a standard free listing.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-67" title="bing-local" src="http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/bing_local.jpg" alt="bing-local" width="567" height="302" /></p>
<p>It’s a shame that the UK version has limited results and not really that relevant either (see below image). I’m not sure if there is any official sponsored results reseller yet, but they do appear to be getting results from Thomson Local.</p>
<p>There is one area on Bing that I really do like and that is the Travel section, it’s pretty much a price compassion site, but it does have the potential to become to only place to search for flights, although its not on the UK version yet, the US version seems pretty well laid out and user friendly.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-65" title="bing-travel" src="http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/bing_travel.jpg" alt="bing-travel" width="587" height="444" /></p>
<p>There is a lot of positives for Bing but is it really that feasible to be taking on the might of Google?</p>
<p><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/PETER%7E1.UNI/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/badda-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
