<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine Optimisation Services, Expert SEO Solutions- Bluelight SEO &#187; seo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/tag/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk</link>
	<description>SEO Services UK!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Alt Attributes Are Important For SEO!</title>
		<link>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/alt-attributes-the-importance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/alt-attributes-the-importance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BluelightSEO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alt attributes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo tactics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often neglected by web designers and SEO experts is the use of alt attributes. Although these tags were designed to allow users with screen readers to understand the content of a webpage, they are also a valuable SEO tag.<br />
You often hear people talk about the importance of using keywords in your heading tags and using bold and strong tags to emphasise text, but I...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Falt-attributes-the-importance%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Falt-attributes-the-importance%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p>Often neglected by web designers and SEO experts is the use of alt attributes. Although these tags were designed to allow users with screen readers to understand the content of a webpage, they are also a valuable SEO tag.</p>
<p>You often hear people talk about the importance of using keywords in your heading tags and using bold and strong tags to emphasise text, but I very rarely hear people talk about the alt attribute. Recently <a href="http://www.seomoz.org">SEOMoz</a> did some studies on the usage of keywords and found that surprisingly the alt attribute had more weighting than the heading tags.</p>
<p>When I am doing SEO for clients or myself I try and make sure that my alt tags are as descriptive as possible without being spammy. I have provided a template and a few examples to help you with your own SEO.</p>
<ul><strong>Template</strong></ul>
<p>Service/Product | Location/s | Secondary Keyword</p>
<ul><strong>Examples</strong></ul>
<p>Accountancy Services, Guildford, Essex- Payroll Services<br />
iPhone covers, UK- iPhone Accessories</p>
<p>If anyone would like further advice or help please <a href="mailto:info@bluelightseo.co.uk">get in touch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/alt-attributes-the-importance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google UK SERPS- How Relevant Are They?</title>
		<link>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/google-uk-serps-conspiracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/google-uk-serps-conspiracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BluelightSEO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few month’s I have noticed irrelevant results appearing in the Google.co.uk SERPS! Many of the sites are US sites and some are even Canadian, Australian or Even Korean. There’s no question that some of these sites are irrelevant to searchers.<br />
One example I took a look at is “LG Laptop Battery”<br />
The first 2 results are great, both .co.uk domains and both...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fgoogle-uk-serps-conspiracy%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fgoogle-uk-serps-conspiracy%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p><img src="http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/google-uk-serps.jpg" alt="google-uk-serps" title="google-uk-serps" width="238" height="138" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-87" />Over the past few month’s I have noticed irrelevant results appearing in the Google.co.uk SERPS! Many of the sites are US sites and some are even Canadian, Australian or Even Korean. There’s no question that some of these sites are irrelevant to searchers.</p>
<p>One example I took a look at is <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&#038;source=hp&#038;q=lg+laptop+battery">“LG Laptop Battery”</a></p>
<p>The first 2 results are great, both .co.uk domains and both UK sites. However the next result is a .au site, an Australian site. The next is a US site, then another Australian site and 3 more US sites, lastly is a .co.kr.</p>
<p>Now I don’t have a problem with buying product from another country, sometime you can get great bargains, however the shipping fee is bound to be high, especially from Australia, not to mention it will take a while to get here.</p>
<p>I have noticed similar results to these when searching for other products, and to me these searches should be mostly UK, as that is where I want to buy from.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/conspiracy-theories-google.html">Dave Naylor</a> had looked at the possibility of this being a conspiracy to promote US sites, however I think it’s purely a problem with the algorithm, especially as it’s not all US sites appearing.</p>
<p>Also with <a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/webhp?hl=en&#038;gl=uk" class="broken_link" >Google Caffeine</a> just around the corner you would expect a fix, however using the same <a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;gl=uk&#038;q=lg+laptop+battery&#038;aq=f&#038;oq=&#038;aqi=g1g-s1g3" class="broken_link" >search term</a>, although different results I am still getting US and Australian site, not good!</p>
<p>Google Caffeine might not be the pick me up after all.</p>
<p>P.S Here is a link to the <a href="http://www2.sandbox.google.com/webhp?hl=en&#038;gl=uk" class="broken_link" >UK version of Google Caffiene</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/google-uk-serps-conspiracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>W3C Validation, Is it worth it?</title>
		<link>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/w3c-validator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/w3c-validator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BluelightSEO</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w3c]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southernmedia.no-ip.org/bluelightseo/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is often debate about the use  of the w3c validator for SEO. Is it really worth your time and effort  to get that green “Passed” sign on the w3c validator?<br />
<br />
<br />
On the whole…Yes<br />
In terms of SEO…No, not really.<br />
Rand Fishkin talks about w3c validation  in his interview with Mike McDonald at WebProNews.com, he states-<br />
“In terms of SEO...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fw3c-validator%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bluelightseo.co.uk%2Fw3c-validator%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-33" title="img_post-01" src="http://bluelightseo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/img_post-011.jpg" alt="img_post-01" width="238" height="178" />There is often debate about the use  of the w3c validator for SEO. Is it really worth your time and effort  to get that green “Passed” sign on the w3c validator?</p>
<div style="margin: 1ex;">
<div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">On the whole…Yes</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">In terms of SEO…No, not really.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Rand Fishkin talks about w3c validation  in his interview with Mike McDonald at WebProNews.com, he states-</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">“In terms of SEO and search engine  ranking, the simple reality is: IT DOESN’T MATTER.  It never has mattered  and I daresay it never will matter.  Can it hurt you to have valid code?   Certainly not.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">I would imagine that most of you would  agree with this statement, and with good reason. I have worked with  many sites that have hundreds of errors, and they still rank just as  well as they do with valid code.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Even Google, Bing and Twitter have  errors, that must tell you something? If Google are ignoring it, then  so should you? Right?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Perhaps not! Although Google isn’t  really bothered whether the validator shows up green or red for you,  there are often accessibility issues that can mean visitors cannot see  vital areas of your site. Although it may appear fine in your browser,  it may not appear correctly in another. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Fixing errors won’t necessarily affect  your SERP’s but it could ultimately affect your conversions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">There are 2 things I would suggest  fixing at the very least, and they are XML Parsing Errors and Missing  Alt Descriptions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">The more people that can view your  site correctly, the more conversions you will make</span></div>
</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 678px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">
<div style="margin: 1ex;">
<div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">W3C Validation, Is it worth it?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">There is often debate about the use  of the w3c validator for SEO. Is it really worth your time and effort  to get that green “Passed” sign on the w3c validator?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">On the whole…Yes</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">In terms of SEO…No, not really.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Rand Fishkin talks about w3c validation  in his interview with Mike McDonald at WebProNews.com, he states-</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">“In terms of SEO and search engine  ranking, the simple reality is: IT DOESN’T MATTER.  It never has mattered  and I daresay it never will matter.  Can it hurt you to have valid code?   Certainly not.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">I would imagine that most of you would  agree with this statement, and with good reason. I have worked with  many sites that have hundreds of errors, and they still rank just as  well as they do with valid code.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Even Google, Bing and Twitter have  errors, that must tell you something? If Google are ignoring it, then  so should you? Right?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Perhaps not! Although Google isn’t  really bothered whether the validator shows up green or red for you,  there are often accessibility issues that can mean visitors cannot see  vital areas of your site. Although it may appear fine in your browser,  it may not appear correctly in another. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">Fixing errors won’t necessarily affect  your SERP’s but it could ultimately affect your conversions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">There are 2 things I would suggest  fixing at the very least, and they are XML Parsing Errors and Missing  Alt Descriptions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;">The more people that can view your  site correctly, the more conversions you will make</span></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bluelightseo.co.uk/w3c-validator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
